Natural Proportion Notation: Tables/Sets
Table of ratios or ratio = RZ values (RZ =1-15)
Pi * MQ * RA^2 = (10/3) or 3.333333333, RA^2 = 1.061016698
Table A: Pi * MQ * (3/10) *RA^2, (10/3) * 0.3 = 1 etc., RA^2 = 1.061016698
1 Pi * MQ * (3/10) *RA^2 (3.1416407860) * (0.3) * RA^2
2 Pi * MQ * (6/10) *RA^2 (3.1416407860) * (0.6) * RA^2
3 Pi * MQ * (9/10) *RA^2 (3.1416407860) * (0.9) * RA^2
4 Pi * MQ * (12/10) *RA^2 (3.1416407860) * (1.2) * RA^2
5 Pi * MQ * (15/10) *RA^2 (3.1416407860) * (1.5) * RA^2
6 Pi * MQ * (18/10) *RA^2 (3.1416407860) * (1.8) * RA^2
7 Pi * MQ * (21/10) *RA^2 (3.1416407860) * (2.1) * RA^2
8 Pi * MQ * (24/10) *RA^2 (3.1416407860) * (2.4) * RA^2
9 Pi * MQ * (27/10) *RA^2 (3.1416407860) * (2.7) * RA^2
10 Pi * MQ * (30/10) *RA^2 (3.1416407860) * (3.0) * RA^2
11 Pi * MQ * (33/10) *RA^2 (3.1416407860) * (3.3) * RA^2
12 Pi * MQ * (36/10) *RA^2 (3.1416407860) * (3.6) * RA^2
13 Pi * MQ * (39/10) *RA^2 (3.1416407860) * (3.9) * RA^2
14 Pi * MQ * (42/10) *RA^2 (3.1416407860) * (4.2) * RA^2
15 Pi * MQ * (45/10) *RA^2 (3.1416407860) * (4.5) * RA^2
Table B notes:
Pi * 0.618033988 = Pi * 2 * (sine 18), = 2/ (MQ*RA) = 1.941611039
Phi * RA * 3 = 5 Phi * RA = (5/3) or 1.666666666
Table B: [sqrt(5) +1] * (1.5) * RA, same as 3.236067977 * RA, (10/3) * 1.5 = 5 etc
1 3.236067977 * RA * (0.3) = 1
2 3.236067977 * RA * (0.6) = 2
3 3.236067977 * RA * (0.9) = 3
4 3.236067977 * RA * (1.2) = 4
5 3.236067977 * RA * (1.5) = 5 etc
Table C: Phi * RA = (5/3) or 1.666666666
1 Phi * RA * (0.6) = 1
2 Phi * RA * (1.2) = 2
3 Phi * RA * (1.8) = 3
4 Phi * RA * (2.4) = 4
5 Phi * RA * (3.0) = 5
Table D notes: Pi * phi * MQ * RA = 2, or Pi*MQ * phi * RA = 2
Pi * phi * (1.5) * MQ * RA = 3 OR (Pi*MQ) * phi * (1.5) * RA = 3, phi = 0.618033988, Pi * phi = 1.941640786 MQ* RA = 1.03007243
Table D:
1 Pi * phi * (0.5) * MQ * RA = 1
2 Pi * phi * (1.0) * MQ * RA = 2
3 Pi * phi * (1.5) * MQ * RA = 3
4 Pi * phi * (2.0) * MQ * RA = 4
5 Pi * phi * (2.5) * MQ * RA = 5
Narrative: Tables of ratio or numerical line values are included here as further evidence in support of the theory that "Evolutionary Proportion" or "Cosmic Proportion" is a distinct matrix that can be detected or described in numerical line values and trigonometric ratios.
More ratios in "Natural Proportion"
Ratios/table ratios NATURAL PROPORTION
Constructible proportions along the way that appear to be a pattern:
My label "pi line" value factor value inverse value .
pi * MQ = 3.1416407860, MQ 1.0000153212 qm 0.9999846791
pi * MQ * TN = 3.1418181818, TN 1.0000564658 nt 0.9999435373
pi * HO = 3.1446055110, HO 1.0009590223 gh 0.9990418965
pi * MQ *TN * (55/54) = 3.2000000000, F5, 1.0185185185, f4, 0.9818181818 A
pi * MQ*RA*RA * (24/25) = 3.2000000000, 0.96 B therefore,
special case: TN * (55/54) = RA^2 * (24/25) = 1.01857603
pi * MQ * TN * (25/24) = (36/11) =3.2727272727 1.0416666666
pi * MQ * RA = 3.3260679770, RA 1.0300566479, ar 0.9708203932
pi * MQ * RA * RA (10/3) = 3.3333333333, 1.0610329539, 0.9424777960
pi * MQ * TN *1.1, = 3.4560000000, 1.1, 1.1000000000, t11 0.9090909090
pi * MQ *TN * 1.1 * (25/24) = 3.6 1.0416666666
pi * MQ * TN * 1.2, = 3.7701818181, S5, 1.2000000, f6, 0.8333333333
pi * MQ * TN * 1.2 * (55/54) = 3.84, S5, 1.2000, f6, 0.8333333333
1 3.1416407860 0.3183050094
2 3.1418181818 0.3182870370
3 3.1446055110 0.3180049124
4 3.2000000000 0.3125000000 two versions
5 3.2727272727 0.3055555555
6 3.3260679770 0.3090169944
7 3.3333333333 0.3000000000
8 3.4560000000 0.2893518519
9 3.6000000000 0.2777777777
10 3.7701818181 0.2652391975
11 3.8400000000 0.2604166667
RA * (sqrt [sqrt(5) -2] *2) = HO/MQ (1.000943687)
RA = 1.0300566479 (sqrt [sqrt(5) -2] *2) = Z, MQ*RA*Z = HO
1.000015321 * 1.030056648 * 0.9717365435 = 1.000959022
Conversion from MQ to HO: MQ*RA*Z = HO
pi * MQ = 3.1416407860, MQ 1.0000153212 qm 0.9999846791
pi * HO * TN = 3.144783074, TN 1.0000564658 nt 0.9999435373
pi * HO [MQ*RA*Z] = 3.1446055110, HO 1.0009590223, gh 0.9990418965
pi * HO * TN * 1.0185185185 = 3.203019797, F5 1.0185185185 f4= inverse: 0.9818181818
pi * HO * RA = 3.239121812, RA 1.0300566479 ar+ inverse: 0.9708203932
pi * HO * RA * RA = 3.336478956 1.0610329539 inverse: 0.9424777960
pi * HO * TN 1.1000 = 3.459261381, 1.1 1.1000000000 t11 inverse: 0.9090909090
pi * HO * TN 1.2000 = 3.773739689, S5 1.2000000000 f6 inverse: 0.8333333333
pi * HO * TN * 1.2 * 1.0185185185 = 3.843682646, S5, 1.20000 f6 inverse: 0.8333333333
We have also successfully constructed the line length with numerical value = 3.142696805, which we will label as Pi*ZM, where ZM = 1.000351462.
NOTATION system, not NUMBER system
The natural proportion values listed here, for example (Pi*MQ), (Pi*HO), (Pi*MQ*TN), and so forth, should be considered numbers in the system of numerical notation called "Natural Proportion." We should not call the decimal digital system or the binary system, or the hexadecimal system or any such procedures for writing numbers as a "number system" but rather as a "system of (numerical) notation" or "notation system." This I argue because the numbers or numerical values are always the same. The numbers are always proportions – proportion is everything – but we can use different methods for writing the numerical values. Or: There is only one number system, but many ways of writing (notating) numbers.
Link back to: (SOLITU COMP Directory) or ...
Link back to: (Welcome) page links.